Master Teaching

a blog for teachers who follow the Master Teacher

Created with a Mind to Love, Learn, and Sacrifice

by Shoshannah Hernandez

We’ve long known that there is a relationship between emotions and learning. And while we have previously had little definitive evidence of this relationship, we have theories that confirm what we suspect from experience. There is the Affective Filter Hypothesis from Krashen[1]which postulates that affective factors such as motivation, confidence, and anxiety can influence second language acquisition. Krashen goes so far as to say that if the filter is high, meaning that confidence or motivation is low and anxiety is high, input may not even reach the part of the brain that acquires language. Long before Krashen, Vygotsky[2] posited that social interaction was the key to unlocking second language learning potential. And so in our classes, we attempt to make students comfortable, build confidence, and provide opportunities for interaction because it makes sense on an intuitive level. However, this connection between emotions and learning has much greater significance.

In March, I had the privilege of attending the annual conference of TESOL International Association in Chicago. The final plenary speaker, Mary Helen Immordino-Yang, shared neurological research that shows emotions trigger the same part of the brain as learning and also survival. She showed images of brain scans in which parts of the brain lit up when someone was emotionally moved. Then she showed the same parts of the brain being activated when new ideas were formed, and learning occurred. And, finally, she showed that this is also the part of the brain that, when a person is in a coma, determines whether the person will live or die. This connection leads to some interesting implications for our teaching. Here are a few that Immordino-Yang explained:

  • Students do the hardest work in the context of important relationships.
  • Learners need to discover new ideas within a supportive environment so they can attach discovered concepts to previous experiences and create new learning experiences.
  • Meaningful learning always involves emotion.

While all of that supports theories that we already believed to be true and confirms the validity of some teaching practices, the most fascinating piece of her talk was yet to come. Immordino-Yang went on to explain this neurological research also suggests that the reason humans are so dedicated to our beliefs and relationships is that we put ideas, emotions, and survival in the same category. Our brain processes those items in the same place, with the same importance. This reason, she said, is perhaps why humans are the only species willing to die for our ideas, die for relationships.

It was at this point that I was reminded of our Master Teacher and the fact that it was Good Friday. This biological link between ideas, emotions, and survival was not accidental. Our Master Teacher very intentionally created us this way. And it was on that Good Friday many, many years ago that the Son used His own perfectly created mind to decide that relationship with us was more important than His own survival. Our Master Teacher created us to love each other enough to surrender our natural instinct to survive for relationships.

And so the implications of this research go much deeper than limiting classroom anxiety or utilizing interaction to yield maximum language production. We were created to learn with the same mind with which we love and with which we choose to sacrifice for one another. What greater love exists than that?[3] I am so thankful for the Son’s ultimate demonstration of love and surrender, a perfect picture of what we were created to do.


[1]Krashen, Stephen David. Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press Inc., 1982.
[2]Vygotsky, Lev. Thought and Language. Boston, MA: MIT Press, 1962.
[3]John 15:13

Further exploration

What’s your perspective?

Please feel free to comment (in the “Leave a Reply” section below) on any of the ideas in this post or in answer to these questions.

  • In what ways do the affective filter hypothesis and social interaction theory impact your teaching?
  • How might this new research that shows the connection between emotions, learning, and survival affect the way you teach?
  • Beyond the Master Teacher’s sacrifice made for all of us, what sacrifices have others made for you?

Post Author

Shoshannah Hernandez serves as the Director for the Institute for TESOL Studies at Huntington University in Huntington, IN. In addition to managing and teaching within the TESOL certification and graduate degree programs, Shoshannah has also led teacher training in China and currently serves local schools with professional development and coaching for English Learner teachers. Before joining Huntington University, Shoshannah taught ESL at Xavier University in Cincinnati, Ohio. She also taught English for four years at Liaocheng University in the People’s Republic of China.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on May 16, 2018 by in affective factors, constructivism, favorite theories, Shoshannah Hernandez.

Categories

Archives

Photo Credit: Eric Fischer via Compfight cc
%d bloggers like this: